TrialNerd_Beth said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Same pattern here, and in the same order. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
TrialNerd_Beth said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Coming at TrialNerd_Beth’s question from a different direction. Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion. Almost every disagreement here turns out to be two people measuring different things and comparing the numbers anyway.
Moderator note: two posts asking for a source have been merged into one. Please search the thread before asking again.
Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesGL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer
Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemFollowing on from TrialNerd_Beth — and this may be the naive question:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
raj_cambridge said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
I read this differently from raj_cambridge, on substance rather than tone. I think the framing smuggles in the conclusion. Ask it the other way round and the obvious answer reverses, which usually means the question is doing the work.