Dr.DermMIA said:I did not do what was suggested, I did something adjacent, and it worked; posting the difference in case it matters to somebody.
Pushing back on Dr.DermMIA here. The counter-case has not been addressed. Somebody upthread described the situation that does not fit, and the thread moved on rather than engaging with it, which is the failure mode this board is supposed to avoid.
Dr.DermMIA said:I did not do what was suggested, I did something adjacent, and it worked; posting the difference in case it matters to somebody.
Agreed, with the usual condition: that holds for the average and this board is a collection of individuals. A population claim and a personal prediction are different things and get quoted interchangeably.
Dr.DermMIA said:I did not do what was suggested, I did something adjacent, and it worked; posting the difference in case it matters to somebody.
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion.
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsClinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. Take it one variable at a time. Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent argument can untangle them after the fact.
jim_asheville said:Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent…
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth.