Nov 12, 2025 at 11:59 PM#16
Dr.SurgeonPGH said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Second this. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
Last edited: Nov 13, 2025 at 3:59 AM
28 1mike_mealprep, NicoleRaleigh, james_edin and 25 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Nov 13, 2025 at 3:24 AM#17
One thing that is still open after HPLC_Greg’s answer:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
Last edited: Nov 13, 2025 at 7:24 AM
29 2RegAffairsDC, BiostatsBrad, PeptideSynthNJ and 26 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Nov 13, 2025 at 6:49 AM#18
Dr.RaviCardio said:For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine.
I read this differently from Dr.RaviCardio, on substance rather than tone. I think the framing smuggles in the conclusion. Ask it the other way round and the obvious answer reverses, which usually means the question is doing the work.
30 3robert_kc, dan_philly, MeganSA_TX and 27 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsNov 13, 2025 at 10:14 AM#19
Dr.RaviCardio said:For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine.
Agreed on the substance. I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.
Last edited: Nov 13, 2025 at 1:14 PM
31 4DeniseRN_TPA, SandraNC_45, Dr.EndoIndy and 28 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report