dave_SLC said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.
Ask again with the specifics and you will get a better answer than this one.
dave_SLC said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
That reframing is the part I needed. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.
Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about. A precise question gets a precise answer; a general one gets everybody’s favourite anecdote.
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsDr.PathRoch said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use.
Dr.PathRoch said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
Coming at Dr.PathRoch’s question from a different direction. Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third retelling.
I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.