From the other side of the consultation, briefly. The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person. Both are real; they answer different questions and get quoted as if they were the same one.
Happy to go further on any of that.
Dr.PulmRoch said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
That reframing is the part I needed. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsLibrarianMeg said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale.
Moderator note: reminder that nothing in this thread is medical advice, and that clinical claims need a source. Carry on.