josh_phd_bmore said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
No disagreement with josh_phd_bmore. One condition attached. Yes, and the corollary is less popular: if the reasoning holds, it also holds where it produces an answer we do not like.
josh_phd_bmore said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Taking it to my next appointment.
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsSallyK_inj said:Yes, and the corollary is less popular: if the reasoning holds, it also holds where it produces an answer we do not like.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
SallyK_inj said:Yes, and the corollary is less popular: if the reasoning holds, it also holds where it produces an answer we do not like.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.
Ask again with the specifics and you will get a better answer than this one.