PharmD_Rodriguez said:PCOS success story with glycaemic control: as someone with polycystic ovary syndrome, this medication has been transformative beyond weight loss.
My labs after 6 months on glycaemic control: A1C 5.7%, fasting glucose 92 mg/dL, fasting insulin 5 uIU/mL. My endo says these are "textbook perfect."
For context, my baseline A1C was 7.9% and fasting glucose was 117 mg/dL. The improvement has been dramatic and consistent.
CarlaRPh_TPA said:Fasting glucose improved within weeks and my HbA1c barely moved for three months, which I now understand and did not at the time.
Complete metabolic panel trending on glycaemic control — sharing because comprehensive data helps everyone:
| Test | Baseline | Month 3 | Month 6 | Month 12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose (fasting) | 124 | 98 | 92 | 82 |
| Insulin (fasting) | 20 | 12 | 8 | 5 |
| HOMA-IR | 4.5 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 1.3 |
| Uric Acid | 8.7 | 6.4 | 5.9 | 5.0 |
The insulin resistance improvement (HOMA-IR) is what my endo focuses on most. Going from 4.5 to near 1.0 is a metabolic transformation.
BenResearch_OR said:My labs after 6 months on glycaemic control: A1C 5.7%, fasting glucose 92 mg/dL, fasting insulin 5 uIU/mL.
Fasting insulin is the lab my functional medicine doctor cares about most for glycaemic control: it's a much earlier marker of metabolic dysfunction than glucose or A1C.
My fasting insulin: 29 → 15 → 6 uIU/mL over 9 months. Target is <7. By the time your fasting glucose is elevated, your insulin has been elevated for YEARS trying to compensate.
Ask your doctor to include fasting insulin in your bloodwork panel. It's cheap (~$20) and incredibly informative.
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsFollowing on from MounjBrad — and this may be the naive question:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
Dr.BariatricHTX said:Fasting insulin is the lab my functional medicine doctor cares about most for glycaemic control: it's a much earlier marker of metabolic dysfunction…
Glycemic variability as the key metric for glycaemic control success: my coefficient of variation (CV) on CGM dropped from 38% to 20%. Target is <36%, with <30% being ideal.
Why this matters more than average glucose: large glucose swings cause oxidative stress, endothelial damage, and promote advanced glycation end-products (AGEs). A flat glucose line at 95 mg/dL is metabolically healthier than oscillating between 60 and 160, even if the average is the same.