The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.
Happy to go further on any of that.
One thing that is still open after Dr.EM_Chicago’s answer:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
LabKate said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. I think the framing smuggles in the conclusion. Ask it the other way round and the obvious answer reverses, which usually means the question is doing the work.
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsLabKate said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
LabKate said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. I will report back once I have actually tried it.