jason_paloalto said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group. The people for whom it did not work post less, and that shapes everything we think we know.
jason_paloalto said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about. A precise question gets a precise answer; a general one gets everybody’s favourite anecdote.
I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View Resultssophie_paris said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth.
sophie_paris said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third retelling.