Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.
LipidDoc_ATL said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Careful with the causal language. Two things moving together in a period when five things changed is not a mechanism, and stating it as one makes the thread less useful to somebody reading it later.
LipidDoc_ATL said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
That is right for the common case. Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsLipidDoc_ATL said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Thank you — that is the clearest version of this I have read, and I have read a lot of them. Taking it to my next appointment.
Moderator note: two posts asking for a source have been merged into one. Please search the thread before asking again. Carry on.