Not trying yet and would like to be within the year, which makes the washout question the one that matters most to me right now.
So the question, as narrowly as I can put it: what the washout thinking is before trying to conceive, and why nobody mentions that fertility often increases as a side effect.
Not looking for reassurance. Looking for the part I have got wrong.
SaraMom3 said:Not trying yet and would like to be within the year, which makes the washout question the one that matters most to me right now.
SaraMom3 said:...everyone should be on fertility and pregnancy...
I understand the enthusiasm, but "everyone" is too broad. Contraindications exist: personal/family history of MTC or MEN2, history of pancreatitis, pregnancy/breastfeeding, and certain GI conditions.
Beyond contraindications, clinical judgment matters. A 22-year-old with BMI 28 and no comorbidities has a different risk-benefit calculation than a 55-year-old with BMI 38 and metabolic syndrome.
Let's advocate for ACCESS without advocating for UNIVERSAL use. They're different things.
anders_CPH said:SaraMom3 said: ...everyone should be on fertility and pregnancy...
Fair, and it stops being fair at the extremes. The middle of the range is well understood; the ends are where the honest answer is that nobody knows.
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsSaraMom3 said:Not trying yet and would like to be within the year, which makes the washout question the one that matters most to me right now.
Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.